Reducing Collisions Involving Bicycles

Index of Strategies by Implementation Timeframe and Relative Cost

Exhibit IV-1 classifies strategies according to the expected timeframe and relative cost for this emphasis area. The implementation time will be dependent upon such factors as the agency's procedures, the extent of the education and enforcement program, roadway-section length, street width, and other factors. The range of costs may also vary for some of these strategies due to many of these same factors. Cost ranges are given in the detailed description of each strategy. A strategy may include several treatments, with different costs and timeframes. The table is meant to reflect the most common application of each strategy.

EXHIBIT IV-1
Implementation Classification of Strategies
 

Relative Cost to Implement and Operate

Timeframe for Implementation

Low
Moderate
Moderate to High
High
Short
(less than a year)
A3. Improve signing A4. Improve pavement markings at intersections    
A6. Restrict right turn on red (RTOR) movements E2. Improve enforcement of bicycle-related laws    
B4. Improve roadway signage F1. Increase use of bicycle helmets    
C2. Implement speed enforcement G1. Fix or remove surface irregularities    
E1. Provide bicyclist skill education G2. Provide routine maintenance of bicycle facilities    
F2. Increase rider and bicycle conspicuity      
Medium (1-2 years)   A2. Improve signal timing and detection A1. Improve visibility at intersections  
  A7. Accommodate bicyclists through roundabouts B2. Provide contraflow bicycle lanes  
  B1. Provide safe roadway facilities for parallel travel B3. Improve bicyclists' visibility  
  B5. Provide bicycletolerable shoulder rumble strips D1. Improve driveway intersections  
  C1. Implement traffic calming techniques    
Long (more than 2 years)     A5. Improve intersection geometry A8. Provide an overpass or underpass
    D2. Implement access management